User talk:Aholladay ncigf
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of National Conference of Insurance Guaranty Funds, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: National Conference of Insurance Guaranty Associations. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 19:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello Aholladay ncigf. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article National Conference of Insurance Guaranty Funds, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi JamesBWatson. Thanks for the feedback. I didn't write the copy for the article; our communications director did. I'm just the CIO. I told our communications guy that whatever we submit needed to be impartial. I think the article is a fair attempt at impartiality. It's very similar to the articles of other organizations similar to ours: NAIC, Reliance and NOLHGA.
I appreciate, tho, that our perspective may be unintentionally biased. Is there some specific content we can change to remove the
 | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (March 2012) |
on the page?
Thanks. Aholladay ncigf (talk) 22:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Aholladay_NCIGF
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)