User talk:Alexander the Kshatriya

January 2021

Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rajputisation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ashley yoursmile! 06:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it was by mistake and I will restore them as I was trying to add a comment along with source. Thank You Alexander the Kshatriya (talk) 06:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia

Hi Alexander the Kshatriya,

Happy New Year and welcome to wikipedia. Your contributions are welcome. Please familiarize yourself with WP:RS and WP:HISTRW. The following is only a friendly formality message for all users editing Indian subcontinent and caste related articles. Again, welcome and I will be happy to answer any queries if I can.LukeEmily (talk)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

LukeEmily (talk) 06:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 11:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For example, this edit, trying to hide behind an edit summary claiming it's about "grammatical mistakes", is pure caste warfare. Bishonen | tålk 11:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Just read the table,comparing Rajputisation and Sanskritisation, can you define a whole community to be Opium consumers, alcoholic, it would same as comparing Christians and Muslims by portraying Muslims as practioners' of ' halala', jihad, polygamy all their negative habits don't you find it unfair even their are other things to compare with some positive customs but editors have vowed to downplay, they are the real casteist.

Alexander the Kshatriya (talk) 15:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]