Jump to content

User talk:Alternate Brazil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2024

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alternate Brazil (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I see no reason why I should have been blocked and accused of being a puppet. I have only made two edits since creating this account. What is the criteria for prosecution and sentencing so quick as it was? Alternate Brazil (talk) 04:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You Arthur Brum
You Arthur Brum
You globally-locked Arthur Brum sock
You Arthur Brum
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alternate Brazil (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Was I blocked for making two edits similar to someone else's five years ago? It seems kind of arbitrary. Does this mean that one can no longer make such edits, that one is automatically someone else's puppet? Can't there be just one case of coherence or coincidence? After all, I have a taste for the history of Brazilian royalty, and many of these edits mentioned are topics of common knowledge among my peers, among historians who study the Brazilian monarchy, among monarchist activists who are millions of people, and even among the common population, given the Brazilian mainstream media attention on the topic since at least 2013. I didn't do anything wrong, I just edited according to my knowledge - which of course can be debated and debated, and I would like to be able to continue editing on Wikipedia, especially topics related to the Empire of Brazil. Alternate Brazil (talk) 16:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't find this explanation plausible. Additionally,  Confirmed to Counterfactual history in my sandboxes, so there's clearly at least some amount of sockpuppetry going on. Yamla (talk) 16:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.