User talk:Amarant edea
March 2008
[edit]
Hi, the recent edit you made to Lovette has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sceptre (talk) 01:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Lovette constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Sceptre (talk) 01:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC))
THE RECENT EDIT IS VERIFIED ON THE PERSON IN QUESTIONS WEBSITE
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lovette. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —C.Fred (talk) 01:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
The birth city is supported by the biography at LukeIsBack.com. That's why it is included in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 01:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
So any web page that posts a supposed birth date is correct, especially one that is obviously biased against the person that wrote it? It is an unfounded piece, and I find it difficult to ascertain the veracity of an actual birthdate from a freelance internet author column dated several years back
- On further inspection, it's also reported by IAFD and AFDB. —C.Fred (talk) 01:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
well Lovette herself has just requested to be removed in total from wikipedia and will be following this all the way through. I guess you will have to find some other way to pass your time
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:C.Fred. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Thedjatclubrock :-) (T/C) 02:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
apologies was unsure on how to talk to other users, thank you for the clarification
Don't re-add a prog tag after it's been removed by another editor. If you think the article should be deleted, your next step is to nominate it for AfD. Corvus cornixtalk 02:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lovette. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 02:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
will not happen again it has been escalated