User talk:Amphicoelias
Welcome!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg/300px-Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Face-smile.svg/25px-Face-smile.svg.png)
Welcome to Wikipedia, Amphicoelias! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Marek.69 talk 07:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Your edit of Bill O'Reilly controversy section
[edit]Greetings, Amphicoelias. I'd say that there were a few things wrong with the edit. For one, the substance of the edit - what you actually write - should indicate the existence of a real controversy and what you wrote didn't really do that. Lots of people deriding a statement by a TV pundit isn't really evidence of a significant (WP:DUE WEIGHT) controversy, which by definition has two sides. Secondly, if O'Reilly's statement did lead to a significant controversy it should have been reported by far weightier sources (WP:RS) than "Know Your Meme;" if you can find more substantial news sources than that one then, by all means use them (I will admit, however, that a few of the other sources used in that section of the article are pretty weak). Thirdly, if the "can't explain that" "controversy" is included, it should really have a more encyclopedic (WP:NPV) heading than You can't explain that! Regards. Badmintonhist (talk) 23:30, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.
[edit]Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis[1], currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.
I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.
Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone! :-)
To take part in the survey please follow the link: www.urcity.com/survey/index.php?user=31020447.
Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 11:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.
![]() |
Research Participation Barnstar | |
For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC) |
Names
[edit]Might be best not to point out his IP. ;) -- A Certain White Cat chi? 19:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Well I just had to say something about it (He did point it out in his latest video), so i kept to "Hank" (instead of "OMG Hank Green edited Wikipedia and i found his edits" :D). Anyway I'm pretty sure his IP changes from time to time and I don't think people will start stalking him on Wikipedia. dftba Amphicoelias (talk) 19:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- No, but now they might :p I welcomed him, I wish he got an account! :) -- A Certain White Cat chi? 19:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- As we do all...Amphicoelias (talk) 19:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- No, but now they might :p I welcomed him, I wish he got an account! :) -- A Certain White Cat chi? 19:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Enjoy the treat
[edit]![]() |
Just for jolly.. also, for Boyle's law K¥U 03:09, 12 May 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks, but I assume you mean Power's law :D. Amphicoelias (talk) 09:05, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
resource exchange
[edit]Hi, here it is: pdf. Please let me know if I may be of any further help. Best wishes, Filip em (talk) 16:31, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hello, unfortunately, I don't have an access to this one :( Filip em (talk) 14:31, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, he article you requested is a book chapter, although I have an access to Springer journals in my library, my access to Springer books is very limited. Best, Filip em (talk) 08:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Amphicoelias. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Amphicoelias. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Amphicoelias. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Amphicoelias. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)