User talk:Andy5190/Deletion

Christianity Deletion Incident

This section of my talk page is a history of what happened on a horrible two days in my Wiki experience. It is closed for further conversation, but is open-records for public viewing.

POV at Christianity

Could you please explain why you placed the POV banner on the Christianity article at it's talk page please. Sophia 22:19, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting Christianity

Hi, you may be inexperienced, or something, and I certainly don't want to take a heavy approach, but please understand that it is quite out of the question to nominate for deletion an article on a major subject. Articles can be deleted because they are non-notable — for example, an article about your French teacher at school. But there is no way that the Christianity article would be deleted. If there are problems with the article, please try to fix them — especially by using the talk page and collaborating with other editors. Nominating for deletion an article on a major subject (Mozart, Shakespeare, Christianity, Germany, etc.) is likely to be seen as trolling or even as vandalism, and might put you at risk of being blocked for disruption if you continued to do so. Thanks. AnnH ♫ 23:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not inexperienced. I am starting a legal Deletion request by Wiki policy. Do not revert the page again. Andy Blak 23:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop, or you could be blocked for disruption. AnnH ♫ 23:49, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Is this some sort of campain to stomp out christianty on wikipedia? GAWD..... Pure inuyasha 23:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Christianity afd

I closed the afd as speedy keep, as having lots of POV is not a deletion critera and besides which, it would be illogical to suggest that wikipedia should not have an article on one of the worlds major religions, as wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Regards, MartinRe 00:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked for twelve hours for disruption and trolling. I note also that you spammend Talk:Satan, Talk:Satanism, and Talk:Atheism for support in deleting Christianity. Please try not to be disruptive when you return. AnnH ♫ 00:07, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at your contributions over the last little while, it doesn't seem like unblocking you would be a good idea. I suggest it would be best for you to find another way to entertain yourself, we're trying to build an encyclopedia here. Jkelly 00:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing? You messed with my userpage. You striked all of my images. Who are you? Why are you messing with me? You mad about the Christianity thing? Get over it. You are a coward to edit my stuff when I am blocked. I request that someone who is not angry to help me out and revert my page before "JKelly" messed it up. Oh and one final note, you, JKelly, are a hypocrit. To have something like "Random Acts of Kindness" on your userpage, then screw me over like this? HYPOCRIT. thanks for being a jerk Andy Blak 01:03, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One cannot render unfree images in one's userspace per Wikipedia:Fair use criteria. Please be much more careful in your handling of unfree content in the future. Jkelly 01:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Replacing of unblock request

I note that you've replaced your unblock request, arguing that you have been blocked for "your beliefs". I'm not going to remove the tag again, but I don't recommend continuously replacing it. You haven't been blocked for your beliefs, you've been blocked because you were being disruptive. Pretty much all of your editing activity today has revolved around nominating Christianity for deletion and advertising your doing so. That's not helping to build an encyclopedia. Even if you thought that nominating articles that you think are POV for deletion was the right thing to do, and even if you thought that uploading a lot of images you found on the web and claiming that they were public domain is okay, your behaviour after you were told it wasn't was still disruptive. What exactly did you expect would happen, other than having the site's administrators revoke your editing priveleges? Jkelly 01:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First off, the images: look when those Images were posted. I was somewhat new to the whole ordeal. Dont blame me for it now. Second, todays incident, I stand behind fully. The only part I regret is spamming the 3 talk pages I spammed. Other than that, I refuse to agree that I did anything wrong, or that I should be blocked for it. As for the spamming: look at my contribs. Today was the only day in the history of my existance to get involved in spamming. Doesnt that require warning before ban?

In the end, I took it too far with the spam, but I had every right to do the other tagging. Surely, some admin out there who is a 3rd party (one who hasnt banned me or you, JKelly) would agree that I should not be banned. Andy Blak 02:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

Your unblock request is denied. If you add back the template again, you will lose the privelege of editing your talk page. AmiDaniel (talk) 05:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Incident

Don't add unfree images to your userspace. Jkelly 18:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey jerk, glad to be back. First of all, before you act like an idiot, take a look at those images not all of them are "unfree". Damn, I hate you with a burning passion. Why do you have to target me? huh? I hereby demand that you remove my pages from your watch list. You will do this. Andy Blak 18:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For those of you who have been insisting my images are "unfree." You may now look at them and see that they are fixed. So get off my back. Andy Blak 18:52, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's very unwise to make threats you can't enforce my friend. but from people like you it's expected. Pure inuyasha 19:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

People like me? Who the hell are you to judge me? Aren't you a Christian? Pssh. Hell no you're not. And also, do not speak to me, just like JKelly over there. I demand that all of you get the hell off of my pages. Go read your bible. Look up "judgement." Here, Ill help you out. Romans 2:1 (thank someone for Google). Andy Blak 19:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Christian. It's just that your first impressions were very poor. your more recent impressions are even worse. if you could show me that you have a nice side about you then i'd be more than happy to be nice as well. calm down first, and explain why you wanted to delete christianity other than some sort of satan VS. god type POV Pure inuyasha 23:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this is actually more-or-less sorted-out now, and there isn't much use in belabouring the point. Jkelly 23:31, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I will leave one note, there is an apology from me located here. I do have a nice side, look at my history... start 100 entries back ;-). I just started something that I shouldn't have started, then was angered by the response, and it exploded. For all of that, I apologize. Andy Blak 01:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection request

I don't know if you have it watched, but there is consensus from three admins that would allow the userpage to be unprotected if given a guarantee that you would not replace the image with another unfree image. Let me know either on WP:PP or here if that would be acceptable to you. Syrthiss 19:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is perfectly acceptable, but please read my note @ WP:PP for more information about my opinion. Thank you for being reasonable. Andy Blak 19:25, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did, and thats why I'm trying to take a personal hand in this as it seems we're all getting off on the wrong foot. I'll go unprotect the page, and make the note at WP:PP. I'm going to be out of the office for a bit after this, but if you need to contact me you can do so here or on my talk page and we'll see if we can help turn this around. Syrthiss 19:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it's cool. I wasn't really calm myself. everyone loses it sometimes. I'd like to say i'm sorry for bashing you. Pure inuyasha 01:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well it looks like everything is going to turn out ok! I apologize for saying those rude things to you too... Once all of this is truely resolved (im looking for an admins aproval of resolution) I will make a new page of my User talk, and all of this will be behind us. And I will get back to using Wiki as a place to share information. Not cause havoc. Andy Blak 01:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]