User talk:Andywatkins1888

Your ==March 2010== Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to San Francisco Giants. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 23:24, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Celebrity sex tape. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 23:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Your edits at the Margaret Clark article appear to be vandlism and have been reverted. If your edits were not vandalism, could you please explain them here? If they were vandalism, you really need to stop. If you revert them again, you will be in violation of the WP:3RR rule. I hope you will make the right decision and stop reverting these edits, as violation of 3RR can get your account blocked. Constructive edits are always welcome - unconstructive edits are not. Thanks. --SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 17:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pwningall for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — Dæ dαlus^Contribs 05:55, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andywatkins1888 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I AM not a sockpuppet! Do a check user-I will even give you my current IP address, and try and tell me it makes this other person? How long has this blocking been anyway?

Decline reason:

Firstly, a checkuser was done, and you were found on the IP address used by Pwningall, so that's not helping your case at all. Secondly, even if one hadn't been done, checkuser can't prove a negative (that is, it can't prove you aren't a sock, only that you are). Thirdly, your behavior is close enough to that of a blocked user that you'd likely have been blocked anyway for disruptive behavior. And finally, this block is of indefinite length, as are all of the blocks on your accounts. Appeal from your main account. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:36, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.