User talk:Angela Calpin

Welcome!

Hello, Angela Calpin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Jessica Barth. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 17:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Jessica Barth.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 18:03, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Date

This is not my birthday. Please stop changing it. Angela Calpin (talk) 19:25, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Your recent editing history at Jessica Barth shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JesseRafe (talk) 20:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 20:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Angela Calpin. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jessica Barth, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). JesseRafe (talk) 16:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you claiming to be Jessica Barth, the subject of the article you are editing? Or are you insisting on putting your birthday on this article? Editors are free to be anonymous if they chose, but sometimes conflicts of interest can arise if they edit articles related to themselves. Also, Wikipedia requires sources and verifiability. Changing the birthdate of a BLP requires sourced proof, do you have any? Someone else can handle the formatting if you are unsure how to do it. JesseRafe (talk) 16:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes

18:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Date

JesseRafe (talk) 19:31, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You appear to be editing anonymously, as you were at Jessica Barth. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in both your account and IP address being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. JesseRafe (talk) 17:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]