User talk:Antioco79

Welcome!

Hello, Antioco79, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dawn bard (talk) 01:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Hypatia of Alexandria‎. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn bard (talk) 01:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Dawn bard (talk) 01:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Important Platonists

Hi Antioco79. Concerning which entries should be bold on the platonism template, lets see if we can't thrash out a compromise? To me an important platonist would be someone who we know a lot about or who has left behind significant surviving works. I can't personally see how someone like Aedesius can be rated important on that scale (at least, compared to anyone else on the template), but clearly you've got a different set of criteria. I certainly could be persuaded that some of the characters you've highlighted might be deserving to be rated alongside Plato and Plotinus. Cheers! Singinglemon (talk) 02:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]