User talk:Apocalypze

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2007[edit]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Bubba hotep 21:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is the only warning you will receive. If you vandalise Wikipedia once again, as you did to Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End, you will be blocked from editing. —Erik (talkcontribreview) - 21:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you were reverted because your information was uncited. However, that does not excuse this edit of yours. Don't disrupt Wikipedia because your edits were removed; ask on the talk page instead, please. —Erik (talkcontribreview) - 21:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep reverting it uncited information then you are a vandal. Please read WP:V and WP:CITE and bring the actual information to save us time and energy. WikiNew 21:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, being uncivil and calling editors "fucking queers" and "dick weeds" while blanking valid content is considered vandalism. —Erik (talkcontribreview) - 21:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been reported for a violation of the 3 revert rule, in the future please take any disputes to the talk page. Thank you.  BIGNOLE   (Question?)  (What I do)  21:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide a direct link to the site where it says this information? I'll put it into the article for you. —Erik (talkcontribreview) - 21:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 05:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Rather than block you, I am going to leave you with a firm warning not to violate the three-revert rule, not to vandalize pages and not to make personal attacks in the future. If you do so, you can expect to be blocked. Consider finding ways to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Heimstern Läufer 06:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Myanw 12:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. - BanyanTree 00:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Apocalypze[edit]

A tag has been placed on Apocalypze, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Captain panda 23:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cquan (after the beep...) 23:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Cquan (after the beep...) 23:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.--Eyrian 00:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]