User talk:Arakan

This is Arakan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Rohingya

The External link didn't say that "blog" was part of the Website's name (it wasn't capitalised); still, if you feel that it needs to be made cleaerer, I've put "blog" outside the link. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:53, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mel,

Thank you very much for your message.

Can you please leave it as i edit now .. I hope it won't effect their organization name . i hope it would be ok soon. regards, --Arakan 11:01, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't entirely understand you, but the point is that the site is a weblog; why do you insist on removing that description? --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 11:51, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mel; you can't just simply say it is webblog look at the domain name . ok?? as i told you before it was base on blogger . that's all ! let me ask you something?? why do you want to make misunderstand to wiki visitor. i think it is a kind of abusing their organization website name title . So; i'm earnestly requesting not to mentioned that blog etc.. ok?? thanks, --Arakan 14:47, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you say, it is a blog. Why are you so offended by the use of the word? Are you worried that Wikipedia visitors would recognize it as a blog? It *is* a blog in every sense of the word. Mel has put the blog outside the link, but it remains a blog, unless you change the website. --

3RR violations

Arakan, you have violated the 3RR rule, by reverting the Rohingya article more than 3 times in 24 hours. Such violations earn an automatic ban. --Ragib 15:41, 11 August 2005 (UTC) hahaha.. rajib, you are making me into trouble huh!, so.. funny .. yeah .. thanks for information..--Arakan 15:49, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not funny; because you weren't warned in advance I shan't block you this time, but if you do it again you will be blocked from editing for twenty-four hours.

Your attitude must change; this sneering approach to other editors must stop. Collaborative editing isn't a game or a joke, not is it a fight to be won. If you can learn to work with instead of against other editors, that would helpful all round. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:13, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

you both --Ragib --Mel Etitis are attacking me many times .. however, i respect the law of wiki and thanks for info.regards,--Arakan 17:22, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, please go ahead and get another administrator (or even another sane user) involved. If you don't want your article to be mercilessly edited by others, the Internet offers you blogs to do that. I haven't attacked anyone in wikipedia except vandals and sockpuppets, and somehow touching the article Rohingya set off a bunch of them against me. Your behavior is actually hurting your cause. Thanks. --Ragib 17:28, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]