User talk:Askolsun

Hi Askolsun. To avoid this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elif_%C5%9Eafak article reading like a PR piece about Ms. Elif Shafak, there needs to be a NPOV. I am aware that there indeed was a letter of support from Zadie Smith, but this does not change the FACT that there was a controversy about plagiarism and this controversy (again, controversy does not point to factuality per se) is legitimately sourced. So since you seem to be the expert on Ms. Shafak, I will leave it to your good hands to weave this controversy into the article using NPOV. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AliAstar123 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Elif Shafak by photographer Muammer Yanmaz.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Elif Shafak by photographer Muammer Yanmaz.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Elif Şafak may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Elif Shafak

Hi Askolsun. Thanks for this edit on Elif Shafak. I have reverted this and restored the old lead section as per WP:LEAD; a lead section should only provide a brief overview of the topic and summarise the rest of the article. The content you added should be added to the body of text before added to the lead. Although it's great that you included references, it is better if a lead section has limited references and instead summarised referenced content in the main section. ,

I suggest if you wish to restore this content you added, maybe integrate it into the relevant sections (e.g. "Career" or "accolades") before adding it to the lead section. It's also good to keep in mind we try to avoid what is called WP:PUFFERY on Wikipedia; only particularly notable awards should be included, and described in a neutral tone. Of course, also please refer to WP:BLP which sets out how biographical articles should be set out. Please go to the talk page if you have any queries. Cheers. Arcahaeoindris (talk) 09:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]