User talk:Aspflcn

November 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 16:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

{{unblock | reason=I don't appear to have done any of the things listed in not here to build an encyclopedia.All my contributions are constructive. Aspflcn (talk) 17:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)}

• Explain this, please; and then there's the edits you made to Christopher Suprun, which appear to be POV edits based on unreliable sources. Drmies (talk) 17:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
• You know what, I see now what's happening in that confusing infobox: I take it back--I thought that you were making all Black Power movements into gangs. The Suprun edits were not good, but by themselves they do not warrant a block, just a note that a. please use WP:RS and use them well, and b. please consider WP:BLP. I'll unblock, with my apologies, and I'm happy to set the record straight. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
• I'll be more careful with the sources and BLPs.Thank you for your quick and adequate response.

Siege of Budapest

You've removed a large sourced block of text twice. The first time was reverted by @DefendingPages: who correctly stated that the sources were used elsewhere in the article and that there was nothing wrong with them. I reverted you the second time. If you feel that there is an issue with these sources, explain those issues on the article talk page rather than reverting. If there is a good reason to remove the text or, preferably, a need to find other sources, it can be discussed there. It seems to be overkill to remove a large section of sourced text because one editor claims the sources are flawed. Read WP:RS and build an argument for the removal of those sources. The section on war crimes against civilians had some problems so I removed that as well. I don't argue against inclusion of that information, just the way it was worded (and we need to make sure the sources can be verified as these topics tend to inflame national and ethnic feelings. We need to get it right. Thanks. freshacconci (✉) 15:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)