User talk:Avedji

March 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see UTRS appeal #41162

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Personal attack

Hello, I'm HistoryofIran. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:02, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

• "POV pushing by an Iranian nationalist"[1] This was a blunt violation of WP:NPA. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Referring to him as an Iranian nationalist is not abusive or derogatory. If it quacks like a duck... Also, reading the NPA page: "Editors are allowed to have personal political POV, as long as it does not negatively affect their editing and discussions." His POV is forcing him to deny historical fact, saying it comes from a place of nationalism is justified

More WP:ASPERSIONS and WP:NPA. You will be reported to WP:ANI the next time you attack me. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

There is no personal attack, just because it is an ad hominem it is not an unjustified personal attack. Your political affiliations are clear and are getting in the way of proper historical analysis. Even some of the sources that you have used, for example in the book "The Letter of Mara bar Sarapion in Context: Proceedings of the Symposium Held at Utrecht University, 10-12 December 2009", the authors refer to the Armenianess of Commagene on pages 48, 99, and 104. Whether or not Armenian culture has Iranian influences does not change the fact that the culture was distinctly Armenian.

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for harassment (campaign). In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

El_C 13:40, 8 March 2021 (UTC)