User talk:AviendhaGarret
Carlos Saavedra Gutiérrez
[edit]Hello there, and welcome to Wikipedia. Please take care removing large amounts of cited content from the article about Carlos Saavedra Gutiérrez, much of it added recently by another new editor, Rickyfortuno. I sense that you are looking for a reason to remove critical content, whilst the other editor has been overzealous in adding critical content with adjectives that are not supported by the citations. Both positions are wrong, and you will note that Rickyfortuno has started a discussion on the article talk page, and thank you for your just posting there, too. I also advised them on their talk page to take care too (see their reply on my own talk page).
I will be happy to see the other editor add back some of the cited negative content, providing it is all fully sourced and contains no personal opinions (which I recognise is hard for a newcomer to appreciate how to do at first). We need to get balance and neutrality in the article, whils also seeing it grow, so I ask you likewise to be careful not to attempt to delete too much the other way. As always, discussion prior to making major changes is far better, and avoids conflict. I shall be watching the article to try to ensure you both collaborate to improve the article in a neutral, balanced and genuinely encyclopaedic manner. Many thanks, Nick Moyes (talk) 00:22, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, and just a reminder to aid overall communication: (Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four keyboard tildes like this:
~~~~. Or, you can use the [ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.) . Thanks, Nick Moyes (talk) 00:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments Nick; much appreciated. As you mentioned, my main concern with user RickyFortuno edits were the editorializing aspects containing adjectives and opinions which flat out unsourced. I understand if you feel I removed too much negative content on Saavedra. Please feel free to reinsert any criticism you feel is correctly sourced. Again, I will continue watching the article; I think it would be wrong for wikipedia to allow an article that includes negative unsourced opinions. (e,g.; “shamefully resigned”, “one of the most controversial tenures”;). Again, thank you for your insight and, as mentioned, it was not my intention at all to remove all negative comments, only unsourced material. Regards! AviendhaGarret (talk) 20:18, 8 March 2020 (UTC)