User talk:Awais 1234567

July 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Danniella Westbrook has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Danniella Westbrook was changed by Awais 1234567 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915841 on 2016-07-01T14:39:31+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, I'm Beeblebrox. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop restoring content without proper references. You restored the one item you found a real source for, the current principal, and used that to justify restoring two entire sections of material that is not in any way verified by that source. Having the entire history of the school's administration is not really desirable anyway, and the section about the ethnicity of the students absolutely should not be there without sourcing. It's important to understand that Wikipedia content is based on verifiability, not "truth". Beeblebrox (talk) 18:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Awais 1234567. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Impact Wrestling personnel

Hi there. Please stop your disruptive editing on the List of Impact Wrestling personnel article, specifically regarding Karen Jarrett's on-air role. Executive consultant is her formal title, on-air and off. An argument to state otherwise is basically picking at something that is a non-issue. Thanks. DantODB (talk) 09:10, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]