User talk:Ayresmith1

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayresmith1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock my account. I am not using multiple accounts, excepting Ayresmith I used before I was blocked and one other I forgot the password to. there are a number of people using the same IP address where I work and I can not be held responsible for all of them and am certainly not the same person

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 02:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Using an account to get round a block on another account is itself a blockable offence. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! I have just looked through some editing history, and if you really think we are going to believe that this is your only sockpuppet account then you must think we are totally stupid, and that's without even looking at the checkuser evidence. It's about as blatant a case of sockpuppetry as I have seen for a long while. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:32, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]