User talk:Balino-Antimod

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Note (for the sake of clarity): issued the above warning because of direct threats [1]. Aditionally I issued another warning previously because of insults and political propaganda [[2]] in my user talk (but were removed). --Sugaar 05:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not leave spurious "warns" on other user's talk pages. I have engaged in no vandalism. If you were to claim that my actions constituted vandalism then it would amount to every message and every edit constituting "vandalism". Your attempts to use "warning" notices for the purposes of intimidation are in breach of correct wikipedia procedures. Here's how it goes, these warns have a purpose, they are not there to try to "scare" people. If you wanted to refer me to Administrator intervention against vandalism you would need to have "warned" me three times. If you had done so and I persisted then you could report me. You would then have to show clearly that I had engaged in vandalism Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. I have not engaged in vandalism, and I think if you reported me you would be the one likely to get blocked, or at the least a reprimand. Your crude attempts to manipulate wikipedia policies do not scare me. You cannot block me, an administrator needs to do that and you need to show "vandalism", and you know very well that what I did is not vandalism. I merely translated some foreigh text on someone's talk page, it ammounts to leaving a message. So please report me, I urge you to, because as far as I can see your threats are empty. Never make a threat that you cannot enforce, something every parent learns. Alun 06:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIV

Please do take care to remain civil in your discussions with other editors -- apparently superfluous vandalism warnings will only weaken your ability to get a fair hearing for what may well be legitimate concerns (content disputes are never considered simple vandalism on Wikipedia). It's important to keep a cool head, even in heated disputes, because "going to war" with other editors rarely ends well for anyone. I urge you to consider the dispute resolution process before things get out of hand. Thanks for your time. Regards, Luna Santin 07:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your page moves

Hi, I've reverted your move from White people to The white race. As you've already been told on Talk:Black people, it's inappropriate to move a page without first making your arguments on the talk page, and even then, pages should not be moved until consensus has been reached. -- Jim Douglas ^(talk) _(contribs) 08:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

¡Enhorabuena por la nueva página!

Estuve en comunicación con M., queremos resucitar el artículo sobre machismo, ¿te nos unes, amigo?--Albinomite 18:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salve Balinnus. Nigra est irredenta adhuc, cave Gallum! Ad horam 11 matutinam die 3.--Albinomite 14:07, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use English primarily in en.Wikipedia, please. The above seems to read: Hi, Baliño. The Black woman [[[Black people]] article?] is unredeemed, beware the Gauls! At 11 am. (note by --Sugaar 06:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

May I illustrate you on Falange

In your userpage, you have a picture of dictator Miguel Primo de Rivera that says he was the founder of Falange. Sorry but that's not true, the founder of that fascist party was his son José Antonio Primo de Rivera. --Sugaar 09:05, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't issue bogus warnings. It is harassment.

Baliño: please do not issue bogus warnings of personal attacks diff. I have not attacked you in any way but you are instead falling in harassment, what can also lead to a block.

I am removing your false and outrageous warn. In the future please provide diffs of what you may consider breaches of civility. --Sugaar 07:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Please try to remain civil, your offensive and possibly personal attack on my talk page is a breach of the civility policy.[3] Please read the essay Don't be a dick and also the no personal attacks policy. The community has been very patient with you so far, you are heading for a block and are lucky not to have been blocked thus far. Alun 07:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use image in user namespace

Hello! You have used a fair use image in your user namespace (Image:Jean-marie_le_pen.jpg). Criterion 9 of the Wikipedia:Fair use criteria states that "Fair use images may be used only in the article namespace. Used outside article space, they are not covered under the fair use doctrine." I have removed it on these grounds. Sincerely, --Oden 17:31, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]