User talk:Berber-freeman
Welcome[edit]
Welcome!
Hello, Berber-freeman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Njaelkies Lea (talk) 14:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Algeria[edit]
hello Berber-freeman, I must tell you that your edits at Algeria seem a little out of what's considered correct at Wikipedia. Please see the Algeria Discussion page (or talkpage) for further info. You can do edits and you can correct informations you think not accurate, but you really should explain them on the talkpage and you should make your figures match with the sources given or add new sources. That are the rules. If you just revert with no explanation or put new text into which does not fit the sources, that would be considered vandalism and you risk that your account be blocked, that means you couldn't do any more edits. Please try to work following the rules, I think it's a great job to keep the Algeria page neutral and well-sourced, sometimes against people who want to put their Arabizing ideology into. Please don't try to counter them by just doing the same on the opposite side. I hope to work well together with you. Thanks! --Ilyacadiz (talk) 15:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Please Berber-freeman, discuss your changes on the talk page. If you continue to change referenced material as you have, without presenting new sources or discussing the edits, you will eventually be blocked from editing. Njaelkies Lea (talk) 15:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2009[edit]
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Algeria. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Njaelkies Lea (talk) 15:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Algeria, you will be blocked from editing. Njaelkies Lea (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Daniel Case (talk) 15:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello Berber-freeman, you have once more engaged in a edit war, deleting sourced material from the Algeria page. This is not considered helpful editing but vandalism. You may have whatever view you want about Berbers and Algeria - you can't delete sourced material without first discuss it on the talk page. I'm afraid the next time, they will block you permanently... that's no fun. Hope to gain your for the cause of a neutral, scientific and trustworthy Wikipedia. --Ilyacadiz (talk) 21:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 13:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)