start talking here please

old problem

A tag has been placed on Digital drafting, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Natalie 17:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, exactly as the above notice says, the article does not assert the notability or significance of the subject. Please read Wikipedia's criteria on notability, as well as our policy on reliable sources, policy on conflict of interest, and WP:SPAM. As the article still does not assert notability, it will be deleted again. And don't forget to sign your posts on talk pages, by typing ~~~~. Thanks! Natalie 17:52, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Katana

Thanks for experimenting with the page Katana on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Bradford44 (talk) 23:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to help you find some references. I have a handful of good books on the topic (which are currently boxed up, due to a recent move) which I can look into if you give me some time. Also, I appreciate your response - most people get angry when their additions are reverted. For what it's worth, I still think you're wrong on some (but not all) of your assertions, but I look forward to working with you to include in the article anything that can be reliably referenced. Bradford44 (talk) 14:08, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]