User talk:Bingobro/sandbox/Prabhatam Aviation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Evaluation of sources[edit]

@Bingobro: I would like to preface this by saying that I don't typically edit aviation-related articles. I'm not really an "expert" on the subject; for that, I would seek advice from WikiProject Aviation, perhaps asking on their talk page for advice.

By far the most important things that new page reviewers are looking for is the quality of sources presented in the article. If the sources are good, the article is more likely to be kept. Because this article is about a company/organization, the relevant notability guideline for this subject is Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). I will now evaluate the sources listed in the article.

Possible contribution to notability checkY
  • Hindu Business Line - refers to airline as "Divine Network", but doesn't mention "Fly Divine"
  • Spotboye.com - This article is filed under "music news" and refers to the airline as "Divine Airlines", not "Fly Divine". I've never heard of the website before, but then again, I'm not from this part of the world.
Marginal contribution to notability exclamation mark 
  • Free Press Journal - This source verifies the information that cites it (i.e. that the parent company for Fly Divine is Prabhatam Aviation,
  • Dumkhum.com - This entire website appears to be written primarily by one person (a Mr. Hemant Sanganee) with little editorial oversight
  • India Infoline - Doesn't specifically mention "Fly Divine", only the parent company's actions
  • The Hitavada - Doesn't mention "Fly Divine", only a test flight conducted by the parent company
  • Sunday Guardian Live - Doesn't mention "Fly Divine", only the parent company's actions
No contribution to notability
  • India Times - OK as a source to verify content, but it appears to be unrelated in main subject matter to Fly Divine
  • Fly Divine - OK as a source to verify content, but to show notability we need sources that are independent of the subject

Overall, I'm not sure, but based solely on this, it doesn't look like this airline is notable enough for Wikipedia just yet. I would ask someone at WikiProject Aviation to double check, however. Mz7 (talk) 02:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mz7: Thanks and please could you ask someone from Wiki Project Aviation to review it quick.