User talk:BioMechanicalBulldozer

May 2020

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Canadian Nationalist Party, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toa Nidhiki05 19:33, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please abstain from threatening others for simply editing pages. We are all here to keep the articles accurate and legitimate, and if you have any problem with this at all, Wikipedia may not be for you.

Thanks, Bio

You can not just removal whole paragraphs and references without explaining. Please discuss your changes at Talk:Canadian Nationalist Party. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:52, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I never removed any paragraphs, this is a blatant misrepresentation of my edits. I simply removed terms such as "White Nationalist" which inaccurately paint the party in a negative light. Not every member is white, and the party openly advocates for the empowerment of the Aboriginal Peoples of Canada ( https://nationalist.ca/2018/08/17/frank-godon-speaks-indian-act/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oc9mvMFTB4 ), so White Nationalist can't possibly apply with any degree of accuracy. I also removed sources that refer to the party as "White Nationalist" as this is clearly a mislabel and incorrect, thus rendering such citations as partially illegitimate on account of their erroneous description.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Canadian Nationalist Party. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ToeFungii (talk) 21:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Canadian Nationalist Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Three users have reverted your edits and you might technically be in WP:3RR. There is extensive conversations on the article talk page regarding what you are trying to change. That's where you should go for additional discussion before making any further changes. TY ToeFungii (talk) 21:42, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]