User talk:Bitsko

Thanks for experimenting with the page Pita Sharples on Wikipedia. Your edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.-gadfium 05:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Pita Sharples. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.-gadfium 05:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Silvereye

You have twice inserted the word misguidedly into the statement it is classified as a native species there and is consequently protected. To call the protection of this species misguided is a subjective opinion, dependent on one's point of view (fruit growers probably think it is misguided, other people who like them would not). In any case it violates Wikipedia's neutrality of point of view, and has been removed. It is neutral to explain different points of view; it is not neutral to assert a single point of view as fact. Sabine's Sunbird talk 08:14, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Opotiki. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -gadfium 01:50, 23 September 2009 (UTC)