User talk:Bizzceleb

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf^(talk) 17:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bizzceleb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Jack Bizz Norman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Hello Alex I am new to the wikipedia editing. Due to my limited knowledge on Wikipedia editing policy I have written against it's policy. I won't repeat the same mistake again. However, what am i supposed to do as i have to take reference from other websites. I cannot write the articles on my own since i need referals. Please help me to write and cite websites without hampering the Wikipedia policy.

Decline reason:

The representatives of the "big ranking websites" are not the ones here editing adding links to their own websites. Your responses tells me that you still do not understand(or have not read) WP:COI. That, combined with the fact that you still want to add links to your website, leads me to conclude there are not grounds to lift the block at this time. As such, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is your association with Bizzceleb? 331dot (talk) 09:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I aw a writer for the Bizzceleb, is there any problem?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzceleb (talk • contribs)

Yes, you have what we call a conflict of interest and are a paid editor. You won't be unblocked to further edit about or link to Bizzceleb. Are there other topics you want to edit about? 331dot (talk) 10:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all i am not a paid editor and the website i mentioned is my own website, so technically I'm not paid by anyone. What happens if i search from other sources and mentioned on my websites as well as Wikipedia? is that a paid contribution. i mean i must write the source of the article right? other wise it would be like writing from your mind, don't you think so?

If your website is how you make a living, or you otherwise get income from it, you are a paid editor. In any event, yes, you should be using where you get your information as the source, not your website itself- if you get your information from independent sources. (celebrities sometimes lie about their age/date of birth). Do you understand this? 331dot (talk) 10:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you visit my website you will find I do it for my passion as there are not single advertisements. And about the source if I get the news or the information only on my website, can i write it? what is this i mean if big ranking websites does it then it's ok and if we do it, it's the reason for the block. For a Wikipedia that is for people, its doing its job very well, hands up...

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bizzceleb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

dot331 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

the admin 331dot takes money from other websites to put their links.

Decline reason:

Bad faith appeal. Your ability to make further appeals has been withdrawn. MER-C 11:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]