User talk:Blahblah29
A tag has been placed on WPPP-LP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Subtle snark? ;-) I'll place an {{Inuse}} or {{Underconstruction}} tag on the article and look for notability criteria in my spare time. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
DC area transit
[edit]Thanks for the work you've done on DC-area transit. It's much appreciated. However, I thought you might be interested to know that even though WMATA may not actually operate all the transit services in the DC area like the Purple Line, Metro's charter grants WMATA the authority to oversee all transit operations in the area:
"The purpose of this Title is to create a regional instrumentality, as a common agency of each signatory party, empowered, in the manner hereinafter set forth, (1) to plan, develop, finance and cause to be operated improved transit facilities, in coordination with transportation and general development planning for the Zone, as part of a balanced regional system of transportation, utilizing to their best advantage the various modes of transportation, (2) to coordinate the operation of the public and privately owned or controlled transit facilities, to the fullest extent practicable, into a unified regional transit system without unnecessary duplicating service, and (3) to serve such other regional purposes and to perform such other regional functions as the signatories may authorize by appropriate legislation." [1]
Since the Purple Line was devised almost exclusively to link the outer Metro stations, and WMATA did the initial groundwork in assessing and surveying the proposed line, it's likely that this project will be highly integrated with (and possibly jointly overseen by) WMATA, just like the Columbia Streetcar. Best, epicAdam(talk) 17:00, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Landon school
[edit]Your addition of minor scandal is turning the article into an attack article, you appear to have become a single purpose account since the last seven or eight months only editing to add this disputed content after its removal. Please discuss here or on the talkpage, please stop adding it without support. Off2riorob (talk) 13:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Discussion is the way
[edit]I assure you stuffing your content back in will not keep it there, discussion is what I was hoping for. Off2riorob (talk) 22:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Note
[edit]Please do not replace totally uncited content to any articles. as you have done here, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Landon_School&diff=373338329&oldid=373335928 please use discussion. Off2riorob (talk) 22:12, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
The article Table of NHL Realignments 1993-2013 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- WP:NOT, no actual content, only a table of hard-to-understand data. Article may perhaps be saved by a total rewrite, hard to judge, but as it stands it is not helpful at all for anyone stumbling onto this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Blahblah29. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Common Ground Athens logo.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Common Ground Athens logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Brower Youth Awards for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brower Youth Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.