User talk:Blain20

Snopes and reliability[edit]

Hello, I'm lol1VNIO. Just so you know, there is consensus that Snopes is a generally reliable source. lol1VNIO^{[not Lol1VNIO]} (talk • contribs) 12:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Snipes is not a reliable source for factual information. A consensus of morons is not a valid consensus. Blain20 (talk) 12:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is consensus by experienced editors. If you disagree, you should have a valid reason for why you think it is unreliable. Until then, removing content that has been supported by a reliable source will be reverted. 0xDEADBEEF (T C) 12:37, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. Snopes didn't write the article. 2. The consensus page indicates that some Snopes articles needs to be checked with other sources. 3. The wording in the Wikipedia entry is unnecessary, anti-Trump, and inaccurate. Any far-right or populist groups using it are using it for the meaning already covered in the entry. Blain20 (talk) 12:41, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Gadsden flag while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:25, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]