User talk:Blaisorblade

Welcome!

Hello, Blaisorblade, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Complexities

Thanks so much for picking up the ball on disentangling and organizing the various articles pertaining to algorithm and cyclomatic complexity. Grad school has kept me so busy that I just plain haven't had time to finish the work that I started. Mucho appreciado. Groupthink (talk) 17:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MacGyver / blocking IPs

Hiya. Well, as you can see, List of problems not solved by MacGyver was deleted under CSD G1, which is good. As regards the anonymous IP removing the speedy tag, you'll find that no-one gets blocked for a single occurrence like that. Have a look at WP:UWT where you'll find the template warnings. You'll see that almost all have several levels of warning, from "whoops it looks like you made a mistake, please don't do it again" up to "right-ho mate, next time I'm calling the heavy squad" (pardon the colloquialisms !) Unless and until someone gets up to, say level 3 or 4, you'll be unlikely to find the admins even willing to consider a block/ban.

Firstly, it may have been done in good faith (WP:AGF) - anonymous editors aren't always there causing vandalism, but may be casual browsers who spotted something wrong and wanted to correct it and don't want to create an account - as a case in point, my first edits to WP were made as an anonymous user :-) Being unaware of WP guidelines/procedures, they may have just edited the page incorrectly and accidentally removed the tag.

Secondly, to get a block or a ban, someone - anonymous or registered - has to have a pattern of repeated and persistent vandalism (hence the multiple levels of warning). Since the page has been deleted, and I'm not an admin so can't check the page history, I can't check any other contributions from that IP address, so don't know if it was a one-off or not. In this particular case, I'm therefore inclined to let it pass - if editors spent time tracking down every person who ever vandalised articles, they'd never be editing ! Besides, vandalism can normally be removed with a couple of mouse clicks - tedious, but not life-threatening :-)

The policy related to deliberate vandalism is covered at WP:VANDAL, and if you ever do need to request a block/ban, then you need to log it at WP:AIV - but if you read that page, you'll see that requirement number 3 is "The user must be given sufficient recent warnings to stop." - hence my point above.

I hope this helps - drop a message on my talk page if you need anymore help :-) CultureDrone (talk) 07:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops - I assumed you were a newish editor until I just checked your contributions, so apologies if you know most/all of the above already ! :-) CultureDrone (talk) 08:33, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, thanks a lot for your info. I am not a newish editor, but I never met vandalism till now, so the only thing I knew of the above was WP:AGF (and some related concepts). --Blaisorblade (talk) 13:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent bad page move and bad speedy deletion of graph canonization

See Talk:Graph canonization for a discussion concerning your recent actions. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

POV issues in Scientific community metaphor

Hello, I saw that you reverted my removal of the POV tag on that article. That tag is not intended to mark articles with POV issues but rather articles with an ongoing POV dispute. If you feel that the content is imbalanced or otherwise needs work, you are welcome and encouraged to go ahead and make the changes. The tag is only necessary if someone then objects to your changes. If you are unable to make the changes immediately, then please at least put a more appropriate tag such as COI or Autobiography and update the date field so other editors will be able to find it. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page! Blessings, -- LWG ^talk 04:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Blaisorblade. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Experimental methods in computing concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Experimental methods in computing, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Blaisorblade. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Experimental methods in computing concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Experimental methods in computing, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Experimental methods in computing

Hello, Blaisorblade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Experimental methods in computing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 16:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Blaisorblade. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]