User talk:Boing! said Zebedee/Archive 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

2009

Re: Welcome to Wikipedia

Gee golly, I am terribly sorry! I now see the error of my ways.
I confess I also made a nonconstructive edit in another article, called DirectCompute! Can you revert it for me? Here's the link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DirectCompute&action=historysubmit&diff=330041401&oldid=327678686
Just click the undo button. Thanks in advance.
Yours etc.
83.212.223.252 (talk) PS: I took the liberty of nesting the headers in the 2008 discussion section. I hope you won't mind.

Odette Krempin

All 4 reverted edits are explained and reasonable, why do you call them vandalism? --84.184.38.166 (talk) 19:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

I called them vandalism because they mainly consisted of a series of defamatory allegations made against the subject of the article, in pursuance of your apparent personal vendetta against her (which included attempts to have the article deleted). The making of defamatory allegations is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. -- Boing! said Zebedee 19:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for watching Twilight (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), now it is semi-protected. --HappyInGeneral (talk) 16:18, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Carlito's Way

Please explain why my edits constitute as vandalism. 121.215.52.142 (talk) 04:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

My apologies. I've just checked and there is, of course, nothing wrong with your edits, which I see you have now correctly reinstated. I must have confused several edits I was checking at the same time, or I hit my Rollback link accidentally, or something stupid like that. -- Boing! said Zebedee 16:46, 31 May 2010 (UTC) (talk) 14:57, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
No worries. 121.215.52.142 (talk) 04:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)