User talk:Bosseaberg18

Gianna Maria Canale[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Gianna Maria Canale, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Also, please see the talk page discussion regarding the need for reliable references if she in fact has died (Talk:Gianna Maria Canale). Dl2000 (talk) 00:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Metallica, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 23:09, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at The Lost (band), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 23:12, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pedro Pablo Nolet. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 23:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Metallica; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 23:17, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bad idea[edit]

You're just going to get yourself blocked, good luck. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 00:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you try reading the warnings left for you. Unless you don't care about being blocked. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 00:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Fern Kinney. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. caknuck _° needs to be running more often 05:48, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]