User talk:Bpazolli

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia.

Your article Percy Nobby Norton reads like a joke. On the tiny chance that you are writing about an actual person, please supply references for what you write. If it's a joke, which seems more likely, please stop now. Some things are funny only once. DJ Clayworth 14:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand

I don't know if this is how to reply to this message, but I can assure you Percy Nobby Norton is a real person. However he has very little information available on the internet the only reference I can find to him is on this one page

http://folkstream.com/reviews/revival/origin.html

Where it says, 'Here is a song Ron Edwards collected in 1958, at Ringwood in Victoria, from Percy "Nobby" Norton, who had learned it around the turn of the century as a young man working in the fruit growing areas north-east of Melbourne.'

I understand that Percy's life is a bit eccentric to say the least, but information on the internet is limited as he was a very local idol and most of Australia dosn't have the internet. That was why I started this article. I can provide more evidence from books, such as poems and songs and mini-biographies, but I do need time and you need to understand that most of the information has been derived by information from interviews with people who knew him.

To loose this article would be a shame, please respond with what I need to do transcripts of interviews, audio recordings I can get them all but I need time.

The easiest way to respond is to say to yourself "that was fun we had a good time making this up", and stop editing. If you are lucky this article will make it to Wikipedia:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense. Incidentally, if you wish to keep editing here, please sign your contributions to talk pages by putting four tildes at the end like this ~~~~ DJ Clayworth 14:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Percy Nobby Norton hoax article

Please do not re-create hoax articles after they have been deleted, as you have done with Percy Nobby Norton. Adding a hoax article even once is a bad idea and certainly not recommended, but it can usually be dismissed as a harmless joke. Repeatedly re-adding a hoax article after it has been deleted is considered vandalism, and is much more severe. Please do not do it again. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Your edits to County jail, Kilmainham Gaol, Gaol and Karrakatta Club yesterday were all unhelpful. If this disruption continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Snottygobble 23:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits today have included an insult and a threat against Starblind, and an apparent hoax at Wesley College, Perth. You have been blocked for 48 hours. Please consider editing constructively once your block expires. Snottygobble 23:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.

My edits to Wesley College, Perth were not a hoax. I'm a student at Wesley and the edit adding "The Wesley Experience - An Experience worth having", is a real promotional motto of Wesley, its on the bottom of all paper from Wesley College. About the threat, I never meant to threaten Starblind and I apologise for that misunderstanding, I never meant to convey that. I just wanted an answer why he deleted my article, he still hasn't provided a good explanation. I feel your trying to silence me. But I will accept an apology by you. Bpazolli 09:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The motto gets zero hits in google. If you want to be trusted and taken seriously, you should build a history of trustworthy, serious edits. Snottygobble 23:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't trust google. Here is an honor award with the motto at the bottom. Click Here!!. I expect an apology.

The image is blocked to external viewers. Snottygobble 12:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very Sorry, but if you copy the shortcut into the location bar and press enter it will work. Or if you use save target as option.--Bpazolli 14:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you misquoted it. Also, I'm having extreme difficulty seeing how this is a noteworthy fact about the school. I'm still of the point of view that the revert was correct. I apologise for blocking you, but like I said, if you make non-productive edits, you create an atmosphere of suspicion. Snottygobble 02:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rfa

I de-listed your nomination. Without 50 edits by your account, lifetime, the nomination wasn't going to succeed... please see some of the other nominations on the page if you doubt this, and keep contributing to WP and feel free to try RfA in a few months. --W.marsh 03:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the third time that you RfA has been delisted from Wikipedia:Requests for adminship in twenty-four hours. As a quondam admin candidate, were you aware of the three revert rule? If not, please take this message as your only warning. Please do not relist your application or you will be blocked for a violation of this rule and/or for vandalism/trolling. Regards, (aeropagitica) (talk) 09:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a bureaucrat incharge of taking care of the RFA page, your nom has negligible change of getting support votes. The process is therefore fruitless. I request you to try again after a few months. PS you are in danger of being blocked for disrupting the RFA process. =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I warned you previously that you would be blocked if you continued to disrupt Wikipedia. Since then you have put up a hoax RFA, run a sockpuppet, fallen foul of 3RR and personally attacked Starblind (again). You have been blocked for one week. You are welcome to return after your block has expired, hopefully to more constructive editing. Snottygobble 23:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.

Here is what I have to say, 1) How can you have a hoax RFA, I wanted to be administrator, it is a nomination, I have the right to self-nominate, and all the information was correct as I wrote it, the speedy delete notice did not have a reason consistent with speedy delete guidelines. 2) I have no sockpuppets name the users that you say are sockpuppets, it's bad enough that you blocked a friend of mine, HRH MJW, who had created his user before me. 3) I'm sorry about the 3RR it's the first time I have heard of it, but I did post a question on the discussion page of RFA if that is what you are reffering too. 4) My attacks on Starblind aren't personal, I have never met him, they are about his ideas. Here is my question are you a sockpuppet of starblind. -- Bpazolli 09:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've indefinitely blocked you per your listing of your failed RfA on your userpage with a attack commentary in which you refer to User:Aksi great as a terrorist. It is pretty apparent that you have not come here to contribute seriously. Blnguyen | rant-line 01:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since further info has come to light, it is now a 14 day block. thanks, Blnguyen | rant-line 07:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for admin impersonation

You have been indefinitely blocked for attempting to impersonate an admin.

You added admin tags to your user page in this diff and attempted to add yourself to the list of admins in this one. You even posted a talk page message announcing that you were impersonating an admin.

Please note that even if this had somehow gone unnoticed, it would not have worked. Adding yourself to the admin list does not give you admin privileges such as blocking and rollback, they have to be added to your account after a successful RfA vote. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]