User talk:Brightestandbest

Essential Foods ‎

Hi. As a start, can I ask what role you have in regard to Essential Foods ? Looking at all those very promotional articles you created on the different Wikipedias, my hunch is that you have some sort of economical interest or are employed in the company. In that case, please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Notability#Self-promotion_and_indiscriminate_publicity very carefully .

As to the article on question, I think the main problem is that you try to describe both the firm, the animal food and the founder at the same time. What is the main focus? Promoting the firm or the dogfood?

I would focus on the firm, but I can't say if the firm is relevant enough for an article. I'm not that much into the criteria here on the english Wikipedia, so I'll leave that to the "locals".

Regards Knud Winckelmann (talk) 20:03, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice. I see that the Royal Canin article has not been flagged as promotional. I will revise my article to mirror that one. If that's not an acceptable strategy, please let me know.--Brightestandbest (talk) 15:23, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bilby (talk) 15:35, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Essential Foods logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Essential Foods logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]