Hi, my name is Sulayman, and I read Wikipedia a fair bit. Feel free to add something below, but no vandalism please.
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
Both the infobox and the lede are meant to repeat material that is in the body. If one of the people lacks a citation, I would encourage you to tag that person, and if no cite is provided in a reasonable period of time to delete it. I've no problem to adding history from RSs. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Fyi, I'm likely to be collaborating with others at the BLP after the protection is lifted in a few days and I see where you had some interest in the article awhile back. The article would benefit from more attention from a larger variety of Editors I think. Mr.Grantevans2 (talk) 14:18, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Master of the Flying Guillotine, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Constitution of Oman
A tag has been placed on Constitution of Oman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 13:10, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi BrotherSulayman. Do you have any references for your new clinical sign article, and in particular any references which distinguish it from Pratt's sign? I spent some time researching these signs, as there were errors in the DVT sign pages previously, and I never came across this one. Regards, GILO A&E⇑ 02:02, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- Good question. I learned about it in medical school, but do not have a good citation. There are numerous references to it on medical blogs but nothing I can give a solid source for. I may be able to find a book reference soon. BrotherSulayman (talk) 02:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Frank Leder 2015.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Frank Leder 2015.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tunku Varadarajan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort Hood shooting. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)