User talk:Bugone

Welcome!

Howdy, Bugone, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions; you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles, see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting pages, visit the manual of style. For general questions, go to Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ; if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.

Additional tips

Here are some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

For Wikipedia policies and guidelines, see The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and What Wikipedia is not.
Find everything in the Directory.
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, the Sandbox is for you.
If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random article button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
If you have edits from before creating an account, see the page on changing attribution for edits.
You can also upload images. Make sure you use the correct copyright tags when you do.
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Be bold

Be bold in updating pages! You can find instantaneous help any time simply by typing {{help}} anywhere on your own user or user talk page.
You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.

 Joe  I 07:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On Original Research

Hi, Bugone. I tagged original research for the link to following paper on Artificial intelligence and you removed the tag mentioning it was presented in a conference.

C.M. van der Walt and E. Barnard,“Data characteristics that determine classifier performance”, in Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Symposium of the Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa, pp.160-165, 2006[1]

Though the paper was presented in a scientific conference, I do not agree that it is widely recognized. No citation from other scientific publication has been made yet. The paper is a mere collection of experiments in my personal point of view, and is not significant enough to be recognized by Wikipedia. If the paper is really important, the scientific community will recognize and it would not be too late to put it in Wikipedia. What do you think? // Memming 19:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]