User talk:Busy Bee

Please sign your username with four tides so I know who posted the massage and when it is posted. Thank you. Busy Bee 22:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your question on Robert Horry[edit]

Wikipedia's manual of style guidelines encourage that numbers between zero and ten are spelled. One of the goals at wikipedia is to aim for consistency in look and style among all the articles. Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#Numbers_in_words Thanks. Professor marginalia 00:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tracy McGrady[edit]

According to the NBA 2k7 game and on NBA's official website, T-Mac is listed as a small forward. User:Ealbert

Why am I blocked[edit]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Busy Bee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

70.48.246.187 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "I WILL KILL User:Steel359(WHO IS STUPID". The reason given for I WILL KILL User:Steel359(WHO IS STUPID's block is: "{{userna

Blocking administrator: Can't sleep, clown will eat me (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have now been indefinitely blocked from Wikipedia for violating the Wikipedia:Sock puppetry policy. I do not believe that it is a coincidence that you have been autoblocked twice on June 17 and June 26 for sharing two different IP addresses with accounts that have been banned for making death threats against an administrator. -- Netsnipe ► 12:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Busy Bee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Look at my contributions, ALL of them were good faith edits OKAY. So, how could I be doing those kinds of things. I didn't create those socks. I don't know who did. I AM INNOCENT.

Decline reason:

Sorry, your claims just are not plausible. — Yamla 19:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Busy Bee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OKAY I created those attack socks. I will just be honest this time. But, just look at the positive contributs in this account. Give me a second chance I won't do those things again. PLEASE

Decline reason:

Creation of vandal/attack accounts shall not be tolerated. Request to unblock denied. - Mike Rosoft 20:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.