User talk:CCorward

For talk about the article on Maurizio Giuliano, please see that article's talk page. The firt part of the same material, for archiving purposes only, is also at a user page I had earlier created for the discussion. I have moved the stuff there to be more tidy.

Article userified

See User:CCorward/Oxford International Forum... — Scientizzle 22:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CCorward, have you been able to locate reliable references for the Oxford International Forum? --SmokeyJoe 02:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SmokeyJoe, sorry for the delay. I have piles of Cherwell and Oxford Student newspaper (1993 to 1996) in a garage. When I have time I'll get round to it and post them. Thanks for your understanding. --CCorward

UN officials in media might be notable

(please also see this debate in its full version here).

12-Feb-2008: You have stated a very good point about public UN officials, who are repeatedly mentioned in the media, as not being notable when so many TV child stars are. Rejecting articles about such UN officials seems to be a "double standard" because those UN officials are certainly identified in those media news reports.

I suspect all that is needed is to emphasize that an article is about a UN official who is repeatedly mentioned in the media (perhaps 3 sources), and that might be enough for notability, versus TV child stars. -Wikid77 (talk) 00:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Very NICE job on the Maurizio Giuliano article Shoessss \| Chat 21:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: . I restored my achieve page but deactivated the links. Again nice work. Shoessss | Chat 21:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Journalist (Russian magazine)

A tag has been placed on Journalist (Russian magazine) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 00:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Journalist (Russian magazine)

I have nominated Journalist (Russian magazine), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journalist (Russian magazine). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 04:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:PPE graduates

I have nominated Category:PPE graduates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Bencherlite ^Talk 11:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Latin American Perspectives

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Latin American Perspectives, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]