User talk:Chris gustafson

Welcome!

Hello, Chris gustafson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Lake Five, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - 2 ... says you, says me 23:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

M-143

We need a source that says that the trunkline has been resigned. The webpage and brochure cited don't say that the roadway has M-143 signs on it, so they can't support the claim that "In summer 2013, MDOT erected new M-143 route markers in East Lansing". Until we have sources that back the statements, we can't update the article. Our burden here comes from the policy on verifiability: our "content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." Imzadi 1979 → 05:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If I acquire a picture of the new route markers and add it to the article, would that be sufficient? Chris Gustafson (talk) 05:37, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it would. As I read it, there is a bit of an exception in the OR policy regarding editor-created images. Unless they are manipulated ("photoshopped") to distort reality, a photo is perfectly acceptable. Either way, a photo would be beneficial, especially if it showcases more of the roadway than just the sign. Then we could update the history, etc, to reflect the previously unsigned nature of the trunkline and indicate the currently signed state. Very little text should be removed, and in fact, text should be added. Imzadi 1979 → 05:52, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll work on getting a picture in the next few days. You can edit the article how you see fit after the image is added, you are more experienced here. I'll also update this talk page. Chris Gustafson (talk) 05:57, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added an image to the article, however I did not mention that the route is now signed like i had previously done. I figure you can do a better job. Chris Gustafson (talk) 20:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the photo, and now the article has been updated :)

Looks great! Also, I just uploaded two more images (here and here), use them how you'd like. I should also mention that Michigan Ave between Clippert and Harrison is now two lanes in each direction with a bike lane, which can be seen in one of the new images. Chris Gustafson (talk) 07:08, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of lakes in Michigan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eagle Lake, Pike Lake and Duck Lake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]