User talk:Lartoven

u just undo the pages where teh word "vandalism" is mentioned? but realy vandals are users who write it. they are jelous about other people activity and try to delete the science as in my case: The Russian Institute for Advanced Researches before to help them try to understand better the case.Ryururu (talk) 07:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Leave your messages below. If you are looking for my user page, it's here

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Calvin 1998! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Ale_Jrb^talk 16:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism level

• Hey, I saw you just elevated the vandalism level. Is it unusually high at the moment? If so, I will help out. I generally fight vandalism a lot, but have had a break from it recently. Just let me know, and I'll be on hand. Steve Crossin (talk) 18:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Hehe, he might want to raise it up another notch. His user page is starting to be targeted. JPINFV (talk) 01:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Redirect

Hi Calvin,

I am new to Wikipedia. I would like the page that bears my name, after a search of "Greg Snyder", to list my biography. Someone with a similar name to mine, a "Ggreg Snyder" has a redirect on my page to his own biography. That's fine, as long as my info is not deleted and we can both be listed under my name heading. I updated my page before to talk about me, but someone deleted my info and returned it to his redirect heading. How can this be rectified?

Tell me how it works.

Thanks, Greg Snyder —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.57.44.85 (talk) 00:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

STS-123 prose

Hi! Thanks very much for your input regarding the structure of the STS-123 article. I have removed the {{prose}} tag you added, even though I agree with you that more use of prose in that article would be a "good thing." The trouble is in finding a way to do that. Do you have any suggestions for how it should be done? If so, let's discuss it at Talk:STS-123! (sdsds - talk) 02:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Artigarvan

That was true, why delete it??

Isn't it obvious? It was vandalism, therefore I rollbacked it on-sight. Furthermore, when reporting false-positives, you should always provide a link to the article as well as a diff. Calvin 1998 ^Talk _Contribs 00:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

hey thanks for telling..me..i'm new to wiki;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rambam94 (talk • contribs) 04:17, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Accusation

Before accusing people of vandalism it is wise to look at the history of the page to see what they added. I clarified a sentence. Do not post on my talk page again. Thanks.--Woland (talk) 18:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

With such high vandalism, any minutely suspicious edit gets reverted. However, I will pay better attention. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 18:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Re:Ruby Ridge

Please stop trying to say that a 7th grader from California knows ANYTHING about what happened here in Idaho. the truth is thisa what would call a fedral agent shooting a 14 year old boy in the back: a hero? or a Murderer. Also I fail to see that a golden retrever poses much of a threat (unless you count being Licked to death) WE THE CITIZENS OF IDAHO FOUND SUFFICENT CAUSE TO TRY THE **SNIPER** (not Sharpshooter) AS A MURDERER. Pleas stop editing it out! Any future edits must contain the facts -there is no such thing as "being constructive" when the truth is at stake. Although you may not like the truth... LIKEING it Is not required.