Jump to content

User talk:Captain Almighty Nutz/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign uphere. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page.BrownBot (talk) 21:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)


The Signpost: 15 August 2011

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign uphere. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page.EdwardsBot (talk) 17:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

Arman Cagle to User talk:Wikipelli

Arman Cagle

Thanks for watching my back. I just thank that the IP user:User talk:96.235.210.85 was saying sorry to me because of my good warning against him.
Thanks!
Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 22:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC) source [1]]

Speaking of assuming good faith...

Hello, Captain Almighty Nutz. You have new messages at 75.192.26.122's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Do you get a medal?

Thanks for reverting my edits, Arman! (<Wikipedia says> "Good dog! Good dog!"</Wikipedia>) Aren't you going to be rewarded with any dogbones for your successful stopping of the intruder? Ruff ruff! Ruff ruff!

I hope you have a BARKING day, maybe WP will get you a nice toy. 

 — Preceding unsignedcomment added by 76.250.36.184 (talk) 22:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

Nomination of User:Arman Cagle/Talk/Template for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article User:Arman Cagle/Talk/Template is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User:Arman Cagle/Talk/Template until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Arman Cagle (Contact meEMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 19:18, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

User:Arman Cagle/Talk/Template

Just a note: if you want one of your subpages to be deleted just tag it with {{db-u1}} (Twinkle can do this for you- look under the "csd" tab) and an administrator will come and delete it for you. You don't need to start a deletion discussion.Hut 8.5 19:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Just a misunderstanding

I wasn't trying to vandalise the article: Sex & Hollywood. I was just trying to fill in the artwork but had trouble doing it. Sorry to give you the wrong idea. Please don't block me from editing. — Precedingunsigned comment added by The Ride (talk •contribs) 14:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, Since I am a roll backer, usually I know when IP's vandalize and I usually deal with them all day. I appreciate your honesty.Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs)

Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 21:30, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Follow-up on Public Broadcasting Question

Thank you for your very quick reply. Please review the following video http://netnebraska.org/media/media.php?bin=NET&vidgroup=LGLM0000566.

We are required by US Broadcast Law to identify the producer of the video (NET) and also identify the organizations who funded the video (two not for profit companies listed at the end.) I understand this can be perceived as both promotion and advertising. I want to make sure we are within the Wikipedia guidelines before posting relevant videos as external links. Unfortunately, any US Public Broadcaster would fall under the same Federal guidelines.

Thanks again,

NET Nebraska NET Nebraska (talk) 16:59, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


Signature

Oh wow, please shorten your signature. There is really no need for explaining any user for contacting you. How disturbing would it be if we all put this in our sigs? mabdul 23:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello, just dropping by. I appreciate your work, and you're doing a good job reverting vandals; however, would you mind possibly shortening your signature? It's not a huge deal, but the extra text does strike me as a bit extraneous. Again, your desire to appear approachable is great, but we try to keep signatures trimmed down for the sake of space.
Whatever your decision be, it's yours to make - just thought I'd share my input. Cheers, m.o.p 19:47, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Refactoring comments

Why did you remove my response to this AIV report? [2] causa sui (talk) 16:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

I didn't think that it was really needed. I mean, The AIV only needs a brief explanation and while it is appreciated that you added more information, it was not necessarily.


Also, I was tracking the IP user too and needed to contact them.

In short, The AIV don't need to have a long explanation and produce that was implied about the edit. Hope this helps. Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 17:50, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

I declined the report. How is that 'not needed'? It creates the appearance that you didn't like that I declined the report and wanted to mislead other administrators. causa sui (talk) 19:01, 29 September 2011 (UTC)


Actually, I am sorry, I did not know that you were giving advice to another person and that you were an administrator. I thought that the tow comments were made by you. My mistake.
So sorry Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 19:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

I don't want to beat too much on this, but just to make clear... Removing other people's talk page or noticeboard comments is a really bad idea, whether that editor is a sysop or not. Your opinion that someone else's good-faith input is unnecessary is not a rationale for deleting comments left by others. This is particularly perilous on admin noticeboards like WP:AIV, but I strongly suggest you not do it at all in the future. causa sui (talk) 19:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Captain_Almighty_Nutz/Archive_4&oldid=1160937636"