User talk:Captain Jason
Welcome!
Hello Captain Jason, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- SCZenz 17:48, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Reverts regarding overcapitalization
[edit]Hi. The thing is that in Wikipedia we do not tend to capitalise most terms. There is considerable debate as to whether ranks should be capitalised, let alone specialisations (personally, I wouldn't capitalise ranks, although many would). When used generically, I do not believe specialisations should be capitalised, although if they were used in an article referring to a specific organisation in which they were formal specialisations then I would lean towards doing so. -- Necrothesp 11:10, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Security
[edit]No problem. It happens quite often, and a lot of people look out for edits like that. Evil saltine 03:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Security guard
[edit]Since I cannot find Captain Jason on the history page (maybe you weren't logged in?) between my last two edits, your message on my Talk passage didn't specify the actual grammar points and your last edit only carries the edit commentary sp(elling, I presume), I'm afraid it's not clear to me what exactly you mean, so I couldn't possibly answer to the point either. However, being an allophone, doubtlessly bombarded by TV etc. with dubious grammar in various varieties of unpolished English, I realize I may well get some things (on occasion horribly) wrong in the grammar department. So please specify your concerns or simply correct them, I have no intention to jealously defend my fallible English grammar. On the other hand, I seriously doubt whether the quoted documentation is to be presumed any more of on infallible authority when it comes to grammar, who really takes the time to double-check that thoroughly? I'ld rather trust an anglophone who really cares, as you apparently do Fastifex 06:27, 19 July 2006 (UTC)