An edit like this, where you have changed a position in an article to disagree with the source used in the article, not updated any sources used in the article, and used only your edit summary to point at a blog as a source is completely unacceptable. Don't make articles disagree with the sources used in the articles: either update the source or leave the position alone. Further such edits may result in your account being blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 16:58, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Once again you have updated a figure without updating the source in the article, used an unreliable anonymous source for your figure and included your source only in the edit summary. The next such edit will result in this account being blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 18:11, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blockedindefinitely from editing for block evasion. You cannot bypass the block on Anthony77600 this way. You will have to log back on as Anthony77600 and use the unblock template to regain access to Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
