User talk:Cherry1779

Welcome!

Hello, Cherry1779, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Lily Sparkletoon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ttonyb1 (talk) 04:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lily Sparkletoon[edit]

A tag has been placed on Lily Sparkletoon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Lily Sparkletoon, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not remove my comments from the talk page. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lily Sparkletoon[edit]

A tag has been placed on Lily Sparkletoon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:49, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Lily Sparkletoon. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:50, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cherry1779. You have new messages at Just James's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Cherry1779. You have new messages at Ttonyb1's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lily Sparkletoon, you will be blocked from editing. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 07:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Outskirts press" is a self-publishing house. That definitely shows that this person you keep writing about is non-notable. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 07:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AuthorHouse is also a self-publishing house. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 07:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of of Lily Sparkletoon[edit]

A tag has been placed on Lily Sparkletoon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It was an article deleted 40 minutes ago under CSD G11 and still has the same issues

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Just James ^T/C 07:22, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. If you recreate Lily Sparkletoon again, you will be blocked for vandalism. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 07:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Repeated bad page creation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

—slakr^\ talk / 07:46, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cherry1779 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Work was cited on final edit.The page is in reference to a article on wikipedia. Lily Sparkletoon is on that page

Decline reason:

Although the warnings above direct you to the notability criteria and the guide to choosing reliable sources, you appear not to have read those policies yet. You appear not to understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and to be trying to use Wikipedia to create a personal profile, in the manner that one might do at MySpace. Since you don't understand the rules, and don't have any plans to begin following them, an unblock would not be appropriate. If, when your block expires, you continue breaking the rules, you can expect to be blocked indefinitely. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.