User talk:Chickadee101

This user is a student editor in Cal_State_Fullerton/COMM_500_Theory_and_Literature_of_Communication_(Fall) .

Welcome!

Hello, Chickadee101, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. Sexual Script Theory is a new topic for me, so I feel I learned a lot. I wasn't distracted by anything.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

I feel that this article is very neutral. I don't detect any claims or frames that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

I don't detect viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented. Everything is neutral.

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

Since the citations haven't been linked yet, I can only say that the citations listed are good and detailed.

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

All information is up to date. The lead and citations just need to be added. Otherwise, the article is really informative. Dimsumyo (talk) 23:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]