User talk:ChiragBeg007

Welcome![edit]

Hi ChiragBeg007! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ekdalian (talk) 13:59, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Other Backward Class. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 14:00, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ekdalian What's wrong with the edit? Please indulge me! ChiragBeg007 (talk) 07:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change 'lower' to 'higher', meaning completely opposite without adequate explanation or citation? Ekdalian (talk) 07:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ekdalian Check reference no. 4 and reference no. 22 on the page. They are from the same article and yet the deductions are contradictory. In the original article (and the various sources that i have read from) it is clear that the population of OBCs are higher than the official figures. The article meant the same and I harmonised the page, removing the contradictions. The person who added 'lower' instead of 'higher' originally is the culprit, not me. Go and check and then make the edit yourself and pat me on the shoulder. I'll edit it again to lower if you ignore this and let the article stay contradictory and deficient. ChiragBeg007 (talk) 07:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't need to change the reference. It is there, in plain sight. Read it yourself. ChiragBeg007 (talk) 07:27, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's the way forward now? Should it be 'higher' or 'lower'? Looking forward to your reply. ChiragBeg007 (talk) 07:36, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are correct! In future, please describe a little more in the edit summary. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 07:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]