User talk:ChocolateCherryNight

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, ChocolateCherryNight. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

24 Horas

I suggest you to not create the article "24 Horas al día", because we don't create an article for any edition of a newscast. The "Tu Mañana", "24 Horas al día", "24 Horas central" and "Medianoche" are all editions of the branded newscast called "24 Horas", and in this case they doesn't apply for different article; you could also edit the "24 Horas" article and adding the information there about "Al Día" edition. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 22:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm warning you about creating again and again the "24 Horas al día" article. "24 Horas (Chilean newscast)" covers all the editions of newscasts made by the Press Department. That's why in the "24 Horas (Chilean newscast)" article are mentioned and described ALL the editions they broadcast. It makes complete sense about including in that article the "Al Día", "Central", "Tu Mañana", etc. editions. --Sfs90 (talk) 22:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please give a valid reason to keep creating this article besides the reasons given to you to do not it again? If you do it again, you will be reported. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 23:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Because there's other pages like this" it's not a valid reason. Think about it. That's not completely different programs, they only have different names but the teams and productions are the same. The fact that BBC, ITV or whatever channel have different articles here doesn't mean that every edition of "24 Horas" or "Teletrece" will have their own article by own merit. Also, you are not adding any reference and any information published here must be referenced. I'm still opposing to the creation of articles without valid reasons; you're not giving any reason about that. --Sfs90 (talk) 23:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's no Gods in Wikipedia. Be careful with that assumptions. It's clear that you're not going to change your mind and I'm not gonna change mine. If you could discuss it on the talk page it doesn't go anywhere, as you were accomplishing your goal of maintaining the articles, and I'm still opposing to that, and I prefer to merge all the possible articles of editions of "24 Horas" or "Teletrece" between their main ones. Regards! --Sfs90 (talk) 23:48, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to expand the article 24 Horas (Chilean newscast) with more information about their respective editions (like I did with the "Tu Mañana", "Al Dia" and "Medianoche" sections inside that article), all of this with reliable sources. With the mess of having separate articles for any edition, then you will have to choose when to publish other information that doesn't fit on an article of an specific newscast (like the production team, the defunct editions, and the cable channel). Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 23:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:24 horas al día.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:24 horas al día.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Preciosa libertad (Preciosas Main theme).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Preciosa libertad (Preciosas Main theme).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]