User talk:ChocolatyBoy

Welcome!

Hello, ChocolatyBoy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Darkness Shines (talk) 17:42, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm Darkness Shines. Your recent edit to the page Bangladesh Liberation War appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:42, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bangladesh Liberation War, you may be blocked from editing. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bangladesh Liberation War‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bangladesh Liberation War‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:ChocolatyBoy reported by User:Ctg4Rahat (Result: ). Thank you. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 18:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Bangladesh Liberation War

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Bangladesh Liberation War. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report of this case is at [1]. It is hard to know if this is edit warring or vandalism. If you believe your changes have sources, you should add the sources to the article. If you add text to the article, it should be in correct English. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]