User talk:Cindy Bowen

Welcome!

Hello, Cindy Bowen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Playing with Gaia... discovering the spirit of Mother Earth, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Favonian (talk) 16:06, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Playing with Gaia... discovering the spirit of Mother Earth

A tag has been placed on Playing with Gaia... discovering the spirit of Mother Earth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 16:06, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Playing with Gaia... discovering the spirit of Mother Earth, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 16:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

advice

As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article. To copy advice from the deleted talk page there, you said

My Book was sold at Book of Knowledge, so they put my title on their page. I also did a book reading there. Immediate deletion is unnecessary. Thanks!

An editor correctly replied

The book may meet notability guidelines but not in the current form. The current article is copied word for word from a copyrighted source. As an author I'm sure you can appreciate protecting the copyright of another writer. Also as the author of this book, you need to stay away from this article as you have conflict of interest and any edits you make are going to likely be seen as promotional of the book.--RadioFan (talk) 20:59, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To explain a little further

as for notability, this depends on the notability of your work-- see WP:CREATIVE. It would depend upon whether the Moonbeam awards is to be considered significant [1]. This will depend upon references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. For books, this is normally shown by book reviews. As you have so far published only one book, the article should normally be about you, not the book--if you have the references

as for copyvio, even if you got us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone with not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable.-- as indeed the tone of this is not. Praise is not wanted, but facts, and a short neutral description of the book. For further information see our FAQ about business, organisations, and articles like this--much of it applies. DGG ( talk ) 21:44, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]