User talk:Clachliath

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 13:43, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clachliath (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here Your reasons are wrong on two counts. First, the account is not used for advertising or promotion. I do not run any business. The website that is referred to is evidently not a business website - I assume you have looked at it? Secondly, for the reasons just stated, the account does not represent a business or other organisation or group. Nor is it a website for more than one person. If you maintain the block, then frankly it does not concern me. I was only trying to be helpful on a topic that does not have much information on it. If you maintain the block, then kindly also remove the change I made to the Seven Summits pageClachliath (talk) 14:29, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your username is that of a website, which is not permitted per the username policy and you will need to follow the instructions in your block notice for choosing a new name. It doesn't matter if it is your personal website. It is also a conflict of interest for you to edit about or link to your own website; you should not do so without article talk page discussion involving independent editors, as an edit request. You will need to agree to make edit requests with regards to edits involving your website in order to be unblocked. I am declining your request.

Regarding your edits, once you make an edit to Wikipedia, it belongs to Wikipedia and generally will not be removed just because you request it. Please read the italicized notice at the top of every edit window. 331dot (talk) 22:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.