User talk:CoasterFreak57

New User

i am new to wikipedia. to Kuru or whatever, the chanes i made to gurnee were not vandalism. they were true facts. i was there. $10 says you weren't

If you take a look at the results of your change (here: [1]), you can see that you also deleted large chunks of text from the article in random places. Since these deletions created an unreadable article with odd sentence fragements, the change was reverted. Since the IP you were using had a history of vandalism of the same type[2] (blanking), my assumption was that this was also intended as vandalism. I honestly missed the text you added about the flood, and I apologise for not assuming good faith. Please feel free and welcome to re-add the content, and I will simply correct any errors that pop up instead of revert the entire change. Kuru ^talk 00:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. just get irritated when i add something that is useful (i have done it on Harry Potter and a few other places) and it is automatically assumed as vandalism. i know i have done it a few times (i think wih ballerina and one more page, but now i am serious. By the way i did not realize that I had deleted all that information.