User talk:CoolRod41

This user may have left Wikipedia. CoolRod41 has not edited Wikipedia since 11 April 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, CoolRod41, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like WWW. SCOTT SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Lets drink Tea 18:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of WWW. SCOTT SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER

A tag has been placed on WWW. SCOTT SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Lets drink Tea 18:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MACGYVER: LOST TREASURE OF ATLANTIS

A tag has been placed on MACGYVER: LOST TREASURE OF ATLANTIS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 13:09, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A few notes

Hello, CoolRod41. Please do not recreate articles that were deleted before, without improving their quality. And what is even more important, do not create articles with a title ALL IN CAPITAL LETTERS. It is considered bad style. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 13:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Johnny Wood

A tag has been placed on Johnny Wood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 23:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who serials

Hi, CoolRod41. Thanks for your contributions to articles related to Doctor Who. Unfortunately, I've had to revert most of them. The bits about Matthew Waterhouse, although plausible, need to be cited to a reliable source, in keeping with Wikipedia's policies. Less important, there have been previous discussions about whether plot summaries for multi-episode serials should be divided by episode, and the earlier consensus was that it wasn't a good idea (in part because when summarizing an entire story, sometimes there's not actually a lot of plot in one episode). However, if you want to discuss this, you're welcome to join the conversation at the Doctor Who Wikiproject — it's nothing formal, just a gathering of Wikipedians interested in improving our Doctor Who articles. Again, welcome to Wikipedia! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 23:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]