User talk:Corporatecom
This page shouldn't be deleted. This page is purely informative about a training company in China. And provides details about the products they offer.
This page shouldn't be deleted. This page is purely informative about a training company in China. And provides details about the products they offer. Please explain how this page is different than this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flextronics
Please advise and I'll resubmit to follow wikipedia's specific guidelines.
- I can';t say I'm altogether happy with that article either, but it asserts being a major company with greater than $1 billion revenue. Further, it's on the NASDAQ 100, which is accepted as sufficient proof of importance. DGG (talk) 04:26, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on CanadAsia Management Development (CAMD), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of CanadAsia Management Development (CAMD) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DGG (talk) 20:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of CanadAsia Management Development Ltd. (CAMD Ltd.)
[edit]A tag has been placed on CanadAsia Management Development Ltd. (CAMD Ltd.) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Oore (talk) 01:24, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Comparison of Extensive versus Intensive Soft Skills Corporate Training Formats
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Comparison of Extensive versus Intensive Soft Skills Corporate Training Formats, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --Finngall talk 17:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
April, 2007 Warning
[edit] Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as the above articles, you will be blocked from editing. . DGG (talk) 18:35, 30 April 2008 (UTC)